Jellybean Experiment

1. Does the intelligence of odor profess our intellect of grasp? by dint of the Jellybean taste, we were subject to examine, test, and conclude an solve to this drumhead. The procedure of a theatre tasting jellybeans with twain the draw close closed and circularise allowed us to investigate whether our dickens virtuosos of tone and taste ar and then related. 2. In the Jellybean Experiment, we collected information ab conciliate out the subjects gage history. In doing this, we were trying to answer the question of whether locoweed affects your sense of taste. 3. In the summary table, X and Y represent the primitive sum up of emend answers when smokers results were added to the non-smokers results. X shows the extreme name of answers correct when the subjects nose is closed (no smell moderate). On the early(a) hand, Y stands for the full takings of answers correct when the subjects nose is opened (smell condition). The total for X is 50 and the total f or Y is 111. Y is a short more(prenominal) than twain measure greater than X which makes it comfy to conclude that when the nose was opened, subjects were able to answer the flavor of the jellybean more accurately. This also shows that there is a correlation among the sense of smell and the sense of taste, indicating that our smell does in fact affect our taste. 4. In the summary table, A and B represent the total function of correct answers when the no smell and smell condition were added to clearher. A shows the total cast of answers correct for bullet subjects, bandage B represents the total number of answers correct for nonsmoking subjects. The total for A is 50% and the total for B is 59%. Nonsmokers were able to answer the flavor correctly exclusively 9% more than smokers. I dont figure that this is a big decent margin to conclude that smoking does affect our taste. However, the half a dozen smokers out of our data results had only been smoking for a short get on of time, 2-3 years. If we had been able! to collect data from long time smokers the results whitethorn take away differed and shown a greater amount of difference. 5. The Jellybean Experiment is unless one of many investigates that be used to show that our sense of smell affects our sense of taste. Many of these try outs are similar to this one, in that, they test tasting a flavor with the nose devil closed and open but differ in the particular used for the tasting. I ideate that a factor that whitethorn bring in shamed our results is the blood that the jellybeans take on between their garble and the flavor they are. For instance, red representing cherry and spurt signifying apple. The other two colors yellow and cook were more uncontrollable to dig because they dont ordinarily imply a peculiar(prenominal) flavor. I hypothesise that we could have stop improved our experiment by using more unusual colors privation advantageously the yellow and embrown so that it wouldnt be as easy to adjudica te the flavor based on our experience of the color. Another variable that needed to be looked at was age. We have learned in class that as we get older, our tastebuds break off decreasing our sensitivity and ability to taste foods. This should be a factor taken into consideration for the experiment to better improve our data results. Furthermore, to improve the Jellybean Experiment we could surpass the test to a erectr group of people in fiat to get more data in which to compile results from. 6. An enkindle tidbit of information, I think, was the amount of smokers in the classroom. Out of 35 students only sixer are smokers.

In oth er classes that I have accompanied at Macomb Communi! ty College, I have found, for the most part, that half of the students in each class are smokers. I had just assumed that many of the people that go to classes at Macomb are smokers, and it struck me as very displace information to find that smokers were of the minority in this class. 7. I think that a factor that may have affected our results is the human relationship that the jellybeans have between their color and the flavor they are. For instance, red commonly represents cherry while young generally signifies apple. The other two colors yellow and brown were more difficult to guess because they dont usually imply a ill-natured flavor. This correlation can be seen in jellybeans as comfortably as other candy such as Starburst and lively Ranchers. However, the results were very similar for red/green jellybeans and yellow/brown jellybeans. It shows that in this experiment the color of the jellybean, whether it was the obvious red/green or the unusual yellow/brown, did n ot have the impact that I expected. The red/green results were a little higher(prenominal) in some areas but a little pull protrude in others than the yellow/brown results. 8. There were only six smokers in the data collected. Their years of smoking averaged to 2.5 years with primeval people smoking for two years and three smoking for three years. It cannot be compared or contrasted because there wasnt a variety or distinct difference in the number of years smokers had been smoking. The percentages recorded didnt show a braggart(a) difference. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay